Anyone can run a hundred agents. We make them one team.

Diffco’s delivery platform, built on Claude Code, gives every agent your plan, your standards, and your compliance rules before it writes a line, then checks everything it produces. A senior engineer signs off on what ships.

Senior engineers in San Jose, CA. Discovery in days, working software in weeks.

Book a 30-minute call

Products we developed are used by

  • American Express
  • Whole Foods Market
  • Starbucks
  • Mars
  • Hilton
  • ChemTreat

Awards and client reviews

  • Top AI Development Company
  • Top 10 Software Developers
  • Top AI Developers
    in California
  • Top Staff Augmentation Company
  • Diffco took on a complex financial system build for us — the kind of work that touches fund accounting and compliance, where there’s no margin for error — and they delivered. They helped us shape our AI product strategy rather than just executing tickets. Real ownership of the outcome.

    Adam HooksCEO at Vero K12
  • Their commitment to excellence ensures our platform remains robust and adaptable to our evolving needs. With their expertise, we've successfully enhanced our offerings, making our collaboration highly effective.

    ClutchRated 5.0

    Pete GualfettiHead of Design and Integration at Good2Go
  • We were impressed by Diffco's approach to the development process and how they engineer new solutions. They look ahead, learn about your product and strategy, and develop sophisticated, highly functional solutions.

    GoodFirmsRated 5.0

    Stas TushinskiyCEO & Co-founder at Instreamatic
  • Diffco supplied us with the skilled engineers we needed to meet our ambitious goals. Their account manager proactively addressed concerns, ensuring our expectations were met.

    DesignRushRated 5.0

    Razvan SpatariuSenior Software Engineering Manager at Multiverse
  • Diffco handled discovery for two complex health tech AI products for us. They’re technically sharp, honest about what’s actually worth building, and easy to work with. They moved fast without cutting corners and understood the healthcare space. Highly recommend.

    Mark MagazuPrincipal at M3 Veterinary Innovation Advisors
  • Diffco's expertise and engineering approach increase the reliability and efficiency of our IoT infrastructure. Diffco has proven to be a reliable partner with exceptional expertise. I highly recommend their services.

    DesignRushRated 5.0

    David C ThompsonSenior Digital Initiatives director at ChemTreat
  • The quality and consistency of the team make Diffco stand out from other vendors.

    ClutchRated 5.0

    Art DanielovCEO at Flashgrid
  • They were communicative, consultative, and helpful. They went above and beyond all the way. What an amazing team. I will work with them again and again.

    CapterraRated 5.0

    Don MarklandCEO at Accountability Now
  • Diffco turned our concept into a polished product from scratch, delivering on a tight timeline. Clear communication, organized project management, and a strong mix of creativity and technical expertise produced an app that exceeded our vision.

    CapterraRated 5.0

    Mason MeninCo-founder at WYA Group, Inc.

Why AI rollouts stall

Faster isn’t the same as better.

Claude Code makes engineers faster. But teams that roll it out by handing out licenses see a productivity spike, then a quality dip. Nothing tells the agents what the product is for, what must never change, or what was already decided.

Every session starts from zero

No shared plan, no rules in the repo, no record of past decisions. Each engineer gets a different Claude, and it forgets by Tuesday.

Agents undo decisions

A requirement quietly rewritten, a constraint dropped, a “no” from March re-proposed in October, because nothing stopped the agent.

No one knows where things stand

Progress lives in a hundred chat windows. Finished, blocked, and broken look the same from the outside.

Big diffs, thin review

Generated changes get waved through because “the tests passed,” when no one wrote down what “working” means.

Secrets leak into prompts

Credentials pasted into chats, production data used as fixtures, and no rule about which models may see your code.

Gains stay with two people

A couple of engineers get far more done. Everyone else gets frustrated. Without deliberate enablement, it never spreads.

What “implementation” means here

Not installing a tool. Changing how your team ships.
Plan, rules, and automatic checks in your repo, proven on your real backlog, with your engineers in charge.

Free 30-minute AI readiness review

We’ll show you what nobody wrote down

Walk us through how your team uses AI today. We’ll map it against your goals and code, and point out the gaps that are costing you.

Book the review

How we work with it

From “set us up” to “build it for us”

Set up your team

Two weeks inside your repo: we write down the plan, the rules, and the checks, connect your systems, and train your engineers to direct agents. Your people make the decisions; agents do the typing.

Best for:Engineering teams that want the speed without the quality dip

Build a new product

Our senior engineers decide what to build and how, and agents do the building, with every change checked and a person signing off before it ships. You’re clicking through a working product in weeks.

Best for:Founders and product teams who want speed and a foundation they can keep

Modernize existing software

We add the plan beside your current code without touching it. New work is checked from day one, and older parts come under the same rules as you touch them. No big-bang rewrite.

Best for:Mature products with no appetite for risk

Ship AI features on Claude

Customer-facing agents, copilots, and multi-agent workflows built on Claude and the Agent SDK. We define what “working” means before writing code, then prove it live before release.

Best for:Products where the AI feature’s accuracy is the product

Rescue an AI-built codebase

A prototype built fast in a hundred chat windows, now buckling under real users. We bring it under one plan, then stabilize, harden, or rebuild. → Vibe Code Rescue

Best for:Funded founders with a working demo and a scaling problem

The platform behind the team

Engineers decide. Agents build. The plan keeps them on track.

Our delivery platform, built on Claude Code and OpenAI Codex, puts your plan, rules, decisions, and compliance requirements in front of every agent before it starts, then checks everything it produces. No agent can change a goal, a requirement, or a rule on its own.

It also learns your project as it goes. Ask for the same thing twice, and it becomes a rule every agent follows.

How a change moves through it

  1. You ask for what you want
  2. We show what it touches and what we’d build
  3. You approve
  4. Agents build, checked against the plan at every step
  5. A person signs off. Later changes go through the same loop.
  • 100+agents per engineer, directed by senior engineers
  • Every changechecked against the plan
  • One pageshows what’s done, what’s waiting on you, and what needs a second look
  • Model-agnosticbetter models drop in without changing how your project runs

What you get

A team that ships faster. And can prove it stayed in control.

A plan every agent reads

Goals, rules, and decisions live in your repo as plain files you own, so every session starts from your product, not from zero.

A check on every change

A change that breaks the plan doesn’t go through. Problems surface when they’re cheapest to fix, not in review a week later.

Proof of “done”

For each key user task, we write down what “working” means first, then demonstrate it live on the real product before a person signs off.

Audit-ready records

Every requirement traced to its code and tests, with a dated log of who approved each change. Built as you go, not as a documentation project at the end.

Why teams choose Diffco for Claude Code

We run it on our own client work, every day.

It’s our platform, not a package

The setup we install is the one our engineers use to ship client systems. Refined on real projects, not assembled for a brochure.

Senior engineers in the room

The people who set up your team direct agents on production code every day. Architects, not trainers.

We’ve done this before

RedTrack brought us in to make its engineering organization AI-native. We found the bottleneck was context, not code generation, and installed the practice around it: specification-driven development, documentation on hard CI/CD gates, isolated agent workspaces. That engagement is the template.

We’ll tell you if it’s the wrong fit

Some codebases, compliance regimes, and teams aren’t ready. We say so before you spend.

Right-sized for the job

Need a two-week experiment, not a full rollout? We’ll run something lighter that ships fast.

Model-agnostic by design

We also run OpenAI Codex. The plan and checks don’t depend on one model, so we choose by your constraints (model access, data residency, existing licenses), not by fashion.

Two ways to start

Set up your team, or hand us the build.

Claude Code setup sprint

Two weeks with your engineers. Days one to three: your plan drafted from everything you already have — codebase, docs, past decisions — and agreed with you. Then the rules and the check go into your repo, agents are pointed at real backlog items, and your engineers direct them with us alongside. Ends with a re-measured baseline and a written operating model you own.

  • Fixed price, agreed up front
  • Your team, your repo, your backlog
  • No new tools for your people to learn — they make decisions and read reports

Build with Diffco

Discovery in a few days to two weeks; a clickable walkthrough within the first weeks; working software soon after. Senior engineers decide, agents build inside the plan, a person signs off live. Monthly team allocation or a fixed scope after discovery.

  • Estimate given as a range with its open questions
  • The plan is yours in full from week one
  • Handover with runbooks and a project you can read

What we bring

The stack around Claude Code —
the part that makes a hundred agents safe

Claude

  • Claude models
  • Claude Code
  • Claude Agent SDK
  • Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Our platform

  • The plan
  • Rules and constraints agents read before starting
  • Automatic checks on every change
  • The decision log
  • Acceptance standards and live sign-off

Delivery

  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • GitHub Actions
  • Linear
  • Playwright
  • Sentry

Also in our toolbox

  • OpenAI Codex
  • Cursor

Don’t see your stack?

Our process isn’t tied to any one model or framework, so we adapt to yours and upgrade as better tools arrive.

Let’s Chat

Let’s build something
great together.

Frequently Asked Questions

Our own AI delivery platform, running on top of leading coding agents — Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. The plan and the checks don’t depend on any one model, so we adopt better models as they arrive without changing how your project is run.

For a setup sprint your engineers need Claude access; we help you choose the plan and the permission model. For builds Diffco delivers, our team uses its own tooling.

No. Your team makes decisions and reads reports. The agents do the day-to-day writing, and the plan is plain files that live with your code.

Your requirements become rules every agent reads before it starts, enforced by automatic checks on every change — including which models may see your code and what data the agents can touch. Secrets are kept out of prompts and production data out of test fixtures by rule, and every change that matters carries a named person and a date. Data-handling terms are agreed in writing before work starts.

Three ways. A check runs every time work is saved, and a change that breaks the plan doesn’t go through. Senior engineers own architecture and every decision that’s expensive to reverse. And before release, a person watches each key user task work on the real product and signs off against a standard agreed before the code existed.

No — it’s how we go faster without losing control. Issues surface the moment work is saved, when they’re cheapest to fix, and the agents don’t stop when the office closes. What disappears is the rework from a requirement that changed in March and was noticed in October.

No. We add the plan beside your existing code without touching it, and the checks apply to new work from day one. Older areas come under the plan as you touch them, at the pace you choose.

You do, in full, from the first week — plain files beside your code, yours to keep and take anywhere, including to another team or another tool.

Usually the one your constraints allow: model access, data residency, existing enterprise agreements, and what your team already knows. We run all three inside the same plan and will recommend against our own preference when your situation calls for it.

The setup sprint is a fixed price, agreed up front. Builds run on a monthly team allocation or a fixed scope after discovery, with the estimate given as a range and the open questions that make it wide.